Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Skiles

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1906No. Appeal, No. 226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 226, Oct. T., 1905, by Albert E. Barnes, from order of C. P. No. 2, Pbila. Co., March T., 1905, No. 8,740, making absolute rule to set aside sheriff’s sale in case of Annie E. Barnes v. Charles E. Skiles. Rule to set aside sheriff’s sale. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order making absolute rule to set aside sheriff’s sale.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This is an appeal from an order, made upon the application of the defendant in the execution, setting aside a sheriff’s sale of 49,174 shares of the capital stock of Thunder Mountain Gold Company, owned by and standing in the name of the defendant. On the day of the sale the deputy sheriff delivered to the purchaser a paper, the material part of which is as follows :

“ Philadelphia, October 9,1905.
“ Mr. Albert E. Barnes, bought at sheriff’s sale, A. E. Barnes v. Skiles, C. P. 2 M. T. 1905, No. 3740. S. W. Barnes v. Skiles, C. P. 3 M. T. 1905, No. 3741. All of defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stroup v. RaymondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Ritter v. GetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Light v. ZellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Phillips v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Assigned Estate of MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Saving Fund Society v. Stevenson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API