Legal Opinion

Kinnison Bros. v. Steger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1928No. 3608. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The jury made the finding upon the controverted issue that the sale and installation of the steam-heating plant was upon a contract made by appellant, not with the trustees of the church, but with the appellee. This original contract was shown to have been an oral one, of date December 31, 1920. •The appellant moved for judgment on the jury verdict; and the court, in view of findings of fact made by him, refused the motion. “The sole question for determination on this appeal,” as stated in appellants’ brief, “is whether or not the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. GoforthTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Cotulla v. UrbahnTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Rowlett v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  4. York v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Mitchell v. ClayTexas Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Guido Bros. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Newport Dairy v. ShackelfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Benny M.B. Daneshjou, Sally Daneshjou and Daneshjou Company, Inc. v. Kasling, Hemphill, Dolezal and Atwell, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016
  4. Humphries v. SimonsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API