Legal Opinion

Norman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 4, 2009No. 321, 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider, among other issues, whether police officers may identify marijuana without being qualified as expert witnesses. Appellant was convicted of murder and other offenses relating to a drug deal that went bad. At trial, police officers testified, as “lay” witnesses, that the substance found on appellant was marijuana. We hold that police officers must be qualified as experts before identifying a controlled substance. The error, however, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, and appellant’s other arguments lack merit. Accordingly, we affirm the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. State v. LDonna Marie YoumansIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Booker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API