Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 2006No. 4D06-3233PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

940 So.2d 498 (2006)

Isac Quincy BROWN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-3233.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 18, 2006.

Isac Quincy Brown, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

2Per curiam

We affirm the denial of Brown's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, wherein he seeks retroactive application of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As we did in Thomas v. State, 914 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), we certify conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), to the extent that…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Isaac v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Atterbury v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atterbury v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API