Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Modzelewski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 37,621PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

By its bill of complaint, plaintiff, on grounds hereinafter stated, seeks cancellation of an insurance policy. By her cross-bill defendant prays that payment of the policy be decreed. Decree was in accordance with the prayer of the cross-bill and plaintiff has appealed.

The insured, Walter E. Modzelewski, was defendant’s husband. On March 17 or 18, 1929, he made application to plaintiff company for a policy of life insurance in the amount of $2,500. The insured was examined by plaintiff’s physician March 19th. The examination disclosing no reason to the contrary, plaintiff’s medical examiner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. McKenzie v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. New York Life Insurance v. AbromietesMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Erdman v. Great Northern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Century Indemnity Co. v. SchmickMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bowman v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. AdieDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Old Line Life Insurance Company of America v. David K. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API