Legal Opinion
Pardo v. Hosier
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided June 14, 1985No. 80-2178, 80-2248PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART
BAKER, Chief Judge.
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, summary judgment is granted for the plaintiffs in part and for the defendants in part.
In these consolidated cases, two inmates from the Pontiac Correctional Center raise five due process claims. First, the plaintiff Enrique Pardo alleges that on two separate occasions he was placed in administrative segregation improperly pursuant to Administrative Regulation 804(II)(J). Second, the plaintiff LaCarttle Jones alleges that on…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pardo v. HosierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Blair-El v. TinsmanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1987
- Enrique Pardo, Cross-Appellant v. Paul Hosier, Louis Lowery, Kent Mills, Lieutenant Richard Foster, W.R. McNamara W.C. Wheat, James Dooley, Ferdinand Klaren, Frank Zeimetz, J.W. Fairman, Jr., R.F. Harweger and Richard De Los Santos, Cross-Appellees. Lacarttle Jones, Cross-Appellant v. Louis O. Lowery, Kent Mills, and Kathy Frederick, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991