Legal Opinion

Rusak v. Acme Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1983No. Docket 64650Published

1Opinion of the Court

124 Mich. App. 805 (1983)

336 N.W.2d 771

RUSAK

v.

ACME TOWNSHIP

Docket No. 64650.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 18, 1983.

Eric J. Rusak, in propria persona.

Blakeslee & Chambers (by John R. Blakeslee), for defendant.

Before M.J. KELLY, P.J., and R.M. MAHER and R.L. TAHVONEN,[*] JJ.

R.L. TAHVONEN, J.

The central issue in this case is whether the defendant township properly established a special assessment district to fund a sanitary sewer construction project. Plaintiff landowners filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that the district was not properly established and that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. RoundMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Nichols v. TallmadgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Rusak v. Acme TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API