Legal Opinion

State v. Baldeagle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 1998No. 95-11-38375; CA A93724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, raising two assignments of error: (1) that the trial court erred in permitting the state to prove that he committed the crimes on dates different from those stated in the indictment; and (2) that the trial court erred in failing to grant a motion for mistrial based on juror misconduct. We affirm.

Defendant’s convictions stem from events concerning one of his daughters. In March 1995, defendant’s eight-year old daughter wrote in her journal that defendant had “been nasty” to her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Moore v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Baldeagle v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. Alcon-AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Jimmie Lee Custer v. Jean Hill, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Jimmie Lee Custer v. Jean Hill, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API