McClelland v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
The testator by the terms and provisions of Item 4 (A) of his will established a “marital trust,” and by Item 4 (B) established a “residuary trust.” The trial judge gave effect to the will as it was written, and as shown by the quoted excerpt in the statement of facts from Item 4 (A), by reducing the amount subject to the marital trust by one-half of the estate passing directly to the wife. The plaintiffs in error, under the construction contended for by them, would omit the word “one-half,” and, in place of reducing the amount to be included in the marital trust by one-half of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hertz v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Hungerford v. Trust Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Davant v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Shoup v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Lane v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seymour v. PresleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Veal v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Bedgood v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Kirby v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.