Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1955No. 18793PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The testator by the terms and provisions of Item 4 (A) of his will established a “marital trust,” and by Item 4 (B) established a “residuary trust.” The trial judge gave effect to the will as it was written, and as shown by the quoted excerpt in the statement of facts from Item 4 (A), by reducing the amount subject to the marital trust by one-half of the estate passing directly to the wife. The plaintiffs in error, under the construction contended for by them, would omit the word “one-half,” and, in place of reducing the amount to be included in the marital trust by one-half of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hertz v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hungerford v. Trust Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Davant v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Shoup v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Lane v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seymour v. PresleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Veal v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Bedgood v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  5. Kirby v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API