Rose v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIE, Chief Justice:
The appellant/defendant, Marilyn Rose, was convicted in the Court of Common Pleas on charges of driving a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and driving while her license was revoked. The Superior Court subsequently affirmed the convictions.
In this further appeal, the appellant contends that the Superior Court erred in affirming the rulings of the Court of Common Pleas because that court afforded her a limited remedy for the State’s failure to respond to informal discovery demands and thus, she claims, deprived her of constitutional rights.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William CuddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Goode v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.