Kimbrel v. Territory of Hawaii
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of keeping a house for the purpose of pros-titution, and the case was taken to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii by bill of exceptions. The exceptions' were overruled, and an appeal was then prosecuted to this court.
The appellee contends that, inasmuch as the case was taken to the Supreme Court of the Territory by bill of exceptions, the 'judgment of that court is not final, and that the appeal should be dismissed. But we deem it unnecessary to consider that question, because, in our opinion, the appeal must in any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. StevensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. WinslowSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fukunaga v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Warner v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Palakiko v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Meyer v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.