Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Das

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 2, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The trustee in this proceeding to settle his account has requested the court to determine the meaning and effect of article Eighth of the decedent’s will. The article in question deals with the investment powers of the trustees and *41the pertinent portion of the text as to which the construction is sought reads as follows: ‘ ‘ Eighth : I hereby authorize and empower my Trustees and the survivor of them and their successors to retain such of my investments as they may deem proper and to invest and reinvest any property held by them under the trust created by this my Will, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. In re the Estate of WilmerdingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of JeffressNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  4. In re the Estate of BackusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  5. In re the Estate of WilkesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  2. Berardi v. W. T. Lane, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. In re the Estate of BrooksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  4. In re the Estate of JannellaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  5. In re the Estate of LevyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API