Legal Opinion
Fines v. Bolin
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1893No. 5070PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from the district court of Hall county. Tried below before Harrison, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the court below. The action was to recover the possession of a quantity of corn undivided. The property was taken by the sheriff under the replevin writ, and delivered to the plaintiff. Upon the trial the jury returned a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered.
It appears from the bill of exceptions that the plaintiff is the owner of a farm of 160 acres in Hall county, which *622he leased for the season of 1889 to the defendant and one Oscar Dewitt, jointly. By the term of the lease plaintiff was to receive as rent two-fifths of all the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kaufmann v. SchillingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Ellingboe v. BrakkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Gillilan v. Kendall & SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Sutherland v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Grimes v. CannellNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by6 opinions
- FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ORD v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Page v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Halsey v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Wilkes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Allen v. CernyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.