Legal Opinion · Dissent

POA Co. v. Findlay Township Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 1996Published

1DissentSilvestri, Senior Judge

A review of the record demonstrates that the majority opinion and order are predicated upon assumed facts not of record as well as an issue not raised by the Township prior to this appeal. Accordingly, I dissent.

The facts as herein relevant are as follows. POA Company (POA) owned 5.5 acres of land which, along its northerly line, abuts State Route 60 (Airport Parkway) in the Township of Findlay (Township). There was no access to POA’s land from the Airport Parkway. Abutting POA’s land at its easterly line is land owned by Martin Media (Martin) (formerly owned by Patrick Realty Corporation).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Calvanese v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Butler Township Area Water & Sewer Authority v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API