Legal Opinion

In Re ALFUZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE PATENT LITIGATION

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 9, 2008No. MDL 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel * : Plaintiffs sanofi-aventis and sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC (collectively sanofi) have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the District of Delaware. This litigation currently consists of four actions, three actions in the District of Delaware and one action in the Southern District of Florida, as listed on Schedule A. 1

Actavis South Atlantic LLC and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., which are defendants in one of the Delaware actions, support the motion. Barr Laboratories, Inc. (Barr), which is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Brimonidine Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
  2. In Re Metoprolol Succinate Patent Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forest Laboratories Inc. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  2. In re Kerydin (Tavaborole) Topical Solution 5% Patent Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API