Legal Opinion

Gunderson's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 30, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We transferred this case from the Appeals Court on our motion to decide whether a retroactive pay increase adopted through collective bargaining arbitration should enter into the calculation of the average weekly wages of Carl Gunderson, an injured employee of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) who is receiving workers’ compensation benefits. The reviewing board (board) of the Department of Industrial Accidents (department) concluded that the employee should receive the benefit of the retroactive pay increase. We agree and affirm the board’s decision.

Gunderson, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sullivan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Powers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Perkins's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Gagnon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Coffin v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sellers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Louis's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Cyr v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  4. Bradley's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. McCarthy's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API