Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Hazle Brook Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1934No. Appeal 25PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The controversy in this workmen’s compensation case had its origin in the filing by the employer of a petition for the termination of a compensation agreement.

While in the course of his employment with the defendant company, as a miner, the claimant was seriously injured on August 2, 1930, by a fall of coal. On August 16th the parties executed, and the board approved, an open agreement for compensation, at the rate of $15 a week, for total disability, payments were made under it until December 15, 1931.

The agreement contained this description of the accident and…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hurtuk v. H. C. Frick Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Walker v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Finch v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Fegan v. MacCabeesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Kutney v. William Penn Colliery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API