Legal Opinion

Lalomia v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John- P. Cohaiait, Jr., J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs seek to establish that the individual defendants (Maddock and Frascella) or either of them maintained on June 5, 1966 a policy of insurance covering them for an unusual and fatal accident that happened on that day.

Michael Maddock, deceased, a 12-year-old boy, came to his death,— as did Jean Lalomia, plaintiff’s intestate — when a contraption being operated by the boy, made contact with a car driven by Mrs. Lalomia. She thereupon lost control of her vehicle and crashed into an obstruction as a result of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Kocak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Kocak v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Kocak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DevlinSuffolk County District Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API