Lalomia v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
John- P. Cohaiait, Jr., J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs seek to establish that the individual defendants (Maddock and Frascella) or either of them maintained on June 5, 1966 a policy of insurance covering them for an unusual and fatal accident that happened on that day.
Michael Maddock, deceased, a 12-year-old boy, came to his death,— as did Jean Lalomia, plaintiff’s intestate — when a contraption being operated by the boy, made contact with a car driven by Mrs. Lalomia. She thereupon lost control of her vehicle and crashed into an obstruction as a result of which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kocak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Kocak v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Kocak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. DevlinSuffolk County District Court · 1970