In the Interest of E.C.

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.

S.K. (hereinafter, “Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her minor daughters, E.C. and A.C. (hereinafter and collectively, “Children”). Mother raises three points on appeal, arguing the trial court erred in terminating her parental rights because the mandates of Section 211.455 RSMo (2000)1 were not followed strictly, there was no clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that her parental rights should be terminated, and termination was not in the best interest of Children. We reverse and remand.

Children were taken into…