People v. Lyons
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*754Defendant was arrested in a "buy and bust” street narcotics exchange involving a transactional undercover police officer, backup officers and a designated "arresting officer”. The perpetrator was convicted of a criminal drug sale in the third degree. At trial, defense counsel requested a missing witness instruction to the jury because the designated "arresting officer” was not called to testify by the People.
The Appellate Division correctly concluded that, under the rationale of People v Gonzalez (68 NY2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. HuertasNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. FranciscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. HaynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. RadcliffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.