Legal Opinion

People v. Hanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered December 21, 1994, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution is precluded because he pleaded guilty to a lesser offense than that charged in the indictment (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 108; see, People v Williams, 185 AD2d 260; People v Nunez, 177 AD2d 656), and, in any event, is without merit (see, Penal Law § 160.10…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. PettwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. NunezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RothwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. TanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API