Mickle v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.
DAVIDSON, Judge.
In his motion for rehearing, appellant insists that the action of the trial court in limiting, if not denying, his right to object to argument of special prosecutor Taylor at the time it was made, cast upon him an undue hardship under the rule stated in our original opinion. It was for this reason we considered the Bills of Exception Nos. Two, Five, Six, Seven, and Eight,- relative thereto.
Argument of State’s counsel constitutes reversible error when some mandatory statute is violated, or new and harmful fact injected into the case, or when…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vineyard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Heidle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- O'Mary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938