Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bednarczuk
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Eule XIX (1) of the Eules of Practice of this court adopts the Canons of Professional Ethics of the American Bar Association, which are in question herein. Eule XVIII (6) states that “each attorney and counselor at law or judge found guilty of misconduct shall be disciplined. ’ ’
Eespondent, admitting his misconduct but contesting the severity of the recommended discipline, asks that this court consider the small likelihood of repetition, the fact that it was his first offense, the fact that he tends to get personally involved with his cases, and previous good conduct as mitigating…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lake County Bar Ass'n v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1971