Legal Opinion

Fetzer v. Boling

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 4, 1994No. 69,248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J.:

Mark Boling d/b/a Boling Construction Co. (Boling) appeals the district court’s decision that Dan Fetzer was covered by and entitled to benefits under the Kansas Workers Compensation Act. The district court’s decision reversed the order of the Director of Workers Compensation which upheld the order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denying an award to Fetzer for the reason that there was no coverage afforded Fetzer under the Act. We affirm the decision of the district court.

At issue is the interpretation and application of K.S.A. 44-505(a)(2) (Ensley).

Boling, a remodeling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Inland Container Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Angleton v. Starkan, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Rodriquez v. John Russell ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  4. Stout v. Stixon PetroleumCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  5. Brooks v. Sam Lochner Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boucher v. Peerless Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  2. Kansas Highway Patrol ex rel. Settle v. 1985 Chevrolet Astro Van VinIGCDM15NOFB177466Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  3. Lester v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Slusher v. Wonderful House Chinese Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API