Legal Opinion

Hunt v. . Johnson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1859PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This action was originally instituted by Elizabeth A. Ridgely, who has since intermarried with William H. Hunt, and subsequent to their marriage it has been continued by consent in the names of the husband and wife. It was for cutting down and carrying away several hemlock trees and other timber, on subdivision forty-seven, in the middle allotment of Great lot number four, of the Hardenburgh patent, in the town of Neversink, in the county of Sullivan, of which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. RockwellCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Jackson v. BradtNew York Supreme Court · 1804
  3. Jackson ex dem. Merritt v. GumaerNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  4. Jackson, ex dem. Kellogg v. VickoryNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Degnan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Burdick v. HeivlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Morse v. HewettMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API