Legal Opinion
Hamburger v. Rottenberg
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided August 1, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from fifth district court Action by Barnett Hamburger against Frances Bottenberg. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtBookstavee, J.
This action was brought upon a written proposal and acceptance by the defendant’s husband as her agent, which is as follows:
“New York, November 10th, 1893.
“Bottenberg B. B. Co.: I will put in a No. 36 furnace (Richardson & Morgan) in subcellar, to heat basement, with one register, with slate soapstone •to be set in register; also, two registers on store floor; these also to have slate soapstone; pipes to be made of 8-inch galvanized iron; also, cold-air boxes for the three registers; all workmanship to be done in first-class order,— for the sum of one hundred and twenty-two dollars and fifty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parke v. Franco-American Trading Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Logan v. Berkshire Apartment Ass'nNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Ball Electric Light Co. v. Sanderson Bros. Steel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cassady v. HortonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900