Legal Opinion

Metschan v. Standard Wine Spirits Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 17, 1942Published

1Per curiam

Writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of defendant on directed verdict.

Having considered the entire record, we reach the conclusion that upon the whole evidence, though in some respects conflicting, and the application of the controlling principles of law thereto, the plaintiff was precluded from recovery and, therefore, no reversible error is made to appear. See Johnson v. Louisville, etc., R. Co., 59 Fla. 305, 52 Sou. 195; Stevens v. Tampa Alec. Co., 81. Fla. 512, 88 Sou. 303; Biscayne Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co., 103 Fla. 155, 137 Sou. 147.

Judgment affirmed.

So ordered.

WH…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Biscayne Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API