Legal Opinion

Switzer v. Smith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 30, 1872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from, Appanoose District Court. Action oe attachment. The intervenor, J os. McGowan, claims the attached property. Judgment for plaintiff. The intervenor appeals. The facts are stated in the opipion.

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

On the 23d day-of December, 1870, Switzer commenced an action, against H. K. Smith, upon a promissory note for $800, dated August 10, 1870, due three *270months after date, and caused Snell, Aiken & Co. to be garnished as the debtor of said Smith.

Snell, Aiken & Co.' answered, admitting an indebtedness to Smith in the sum of $366.60.

On the 19th day of January, 1871, Joseph McGowan commenced an action against H. Eh Smith & Co., being H. Kh Smith, Aaron Booth and Jacob Firman, for the sum of $125.50, and caused Snell, Aiken & Co. to be garnished therein, who answered that they were indebted to II.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conyngham v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Pierce v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howe & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Smith v. Smith Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Downing v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. First Nat. Bank of Council Bluffs v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  5. L. Fullam & Co. v. Abrahams & EpstineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API