Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel E. Besler

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 21, 1996No. 96-1220PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

The Sentencing Guidelines afford defendants a downward departure for voluntarily disclosing their offense prior to its discovery. U.S.S.G. § 5K2.16. The Guidelines state in plain language that such a downward departure is only warranted where the offense was unlikely to have been discovered absent the defendant’s disclosure. The district court in this case granted a downward departure but made inadequate findings regarding the likelihood of discovery, focusing instead on the defendant’s subjective motivations for disclosing his offense. We therefore vacate and remand…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. James E. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Gene Francis Newby and Raynaldo Barber. Gene Francis Newby (Appellant in No. 92-5711). Raynaldo Barber (Appellant in No. 92-5712)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Ronald G. RitsemaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Raymond Keith ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. David Tenorio SablanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. John F. LovaasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Lowell J. EkelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Michael Edward AertsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Robin FerronCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API