Legal Opinion
Cannady v. State of Maryland
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 8, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-3822Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) VINCENT CANNADY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:19-cv-3822-RCL ) STATE OF MARYLAND, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Vincent Cannady, a Missouri resident, brings this case pro se against defendants the State of Maryland, the City of Baltimore, and Talbot County, Maryland as well as against Judge Julie Annette Highley-Keutzer, a Missouri resident. Maryland (ECF No. 13), Baltimore (ECF No. 17), and Talbot County (ECF No. 7) have moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Kent B. Crane v. New York Zoological SocietyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.