Legal Opinion
State v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided April 3, 2008No. 20060218-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
4 1 Appellant Luke Zachary Baker entered a Sery plea after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. See generally State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935, 937-40 (Utah Ct.App.1988). Baker contends that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress because, he asserts, from the moment the officers placed the driver under arrest, Baker, a passenger in the driver's vehicle, was unlawfully detained. We agree, and thus reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND 1
T2 In the early morning hours of September 30, 2004, Baker was riding in the back*937seat of a car traveling through Pleasant…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- State v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.