Legal Opinion
United States v. Adam Bros. Farming, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 12, 2004No. CV 00-07409CASPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
SNYDER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The present case is brought by the United States under the Clean Water Act, 33 Ü.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (“CWA”). The government filed its complaint on July 7, 2000, alleging that defendants Richard Adam, his sons Peter, Kieran and Dominic Adam, and the family’s businesses, Adam Brothers Farming, Inc., and Iceberg Holdings, L.P., violated the CWA by draining, filling and grading wetlands and channelizing a creek on their property without a permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”).
*1181II…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Roland C. Dubois and Restore: The North Woods v. United States Department of Agriculture, and Loon Mountain Recreation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Robin James, a Married Person in Her Separate Capacity v. Price Stern Sloan, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Penguin Putnam, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Rice v. Harken Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.