Legal Opinion

Claim of Arcangelo v. Gallo & Laguidara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, G-allo & Lagüidara and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the New York city office of said Commission on the 28th day of September, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

Lyon, J.:

The claimant was injured in the city of New York March 2, 1916, by a drop of plaster falling in his right eye while plastering a ceiling. He thereupon presented a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 6Y; Laws of 1914, chap. 41, as amd.). The claim came on for hearing before a Deputy Commissioner April twenty-seventh, June fifteenth and August third, at each of which times an award was made, and the case continued, the awards of the two earlier dates being at the rate of fifteen dollars per week. The fourth and final hearing was had and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Grammici v. . ZinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moray v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Arnold v. S. R. Mfg. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Reichelson v. Steinberg & DubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API