Legal Opinion

Huron v. Schomaker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1936No. Appeal, 13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This action in assumpsit was brought originally before an alderman by Michael W. Huron against “W. S. Schomaker, O. T. Sweeney, James P. Casey, individually and as co-partners, trading and doing business under the name of O. T. Sweeney, a partnership,” to recover fees for professional services. Judgment was entered in the alderman’s office in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, individually and as partners, for $148.50. From this judgment, appeal was taken to the county court of Allegheny county by W. S. Schomaker, who alone filed an answer, denying that he was a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. TracySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Reed, Crane & Co. v. Kremer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. McNeilan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Huron v. SchomakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API