Legal Opinion
Progressive Preferred Insurance v. Seppala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 2007No. 05-36015Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company and Progressive American Insurance Company (collectively, “Progressive”) appeal from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Matthew and Melinda Seppala. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment, see Arakaki v. Hawaii, 314 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir.2002), and we reverse. Because the facts of this case are familiar to the parties, we recite them here only to the extent necessary to explain our decision.
The anti-stacking clause in Progressive’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Arakaki v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hawn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1991
- Parker v. United Services Automobile AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999