Legal Opinion

Slicer v. Quigley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 15, 1980PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiff, Linda Slicer, brought this action against the defendants David Quigley, Dennis Quigley and Reynold Burger, Jr., seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendants. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the Quigleys, but a defendant’s verdict in favor of Burger. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered and assigns error in the court’s charge in several respects.

The defendants David Quigley and Reynold Burger, Jr., were minors, nineteen and twenty years old,1 when the following events took place. The two met…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Wiener v. Gamma Phi Chapter of Alpha Tau Omega FraternityOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Nolan v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. State v. HolmquistSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Kowal v. HofherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Price v. HalsteadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API