Legal Opinion

Scott v. Royal Castle System, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1967No. 2731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

Plaintiffs seek workmen’s compensation for the wife’s total and permanent disability, medical expenses, penalties and attorney’s fees. The District Judge awarded her $35.00 a week for a period not to exceed 400 weeks, based on total and permanent disability, and medical expenses; but denied penalties and attorney’s fees. On appeal Plaintiff urges: (1) that statutory penalties and attorney’s fees be allowed under LSA-R.S. 22:658; and (2) that the expert fee allowed Dr. Blaise Salatich, orthopedist, be increased from $100 to $200.

Plaintiff was injured on May 10, 1965, when she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coine v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Tison v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. McClelland v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Stroud v. Tremont Lumber CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Funderburk v. Southwestern Iron Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reichert v. Continental Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Baghramain v. MFA Mutual Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Chavis v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Zeringue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Lee v. MortillaroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API