Legal Opinion

Woods v. White Star Line

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1910No. Docket No. 80PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Law, J. Case by Rosetta Woods against the White Star Line for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant purchased certain premises bordering on the St. Clair river at Port Huron for the purpose of providing a dock for its steamer. This dock was not the place of its general wharf business at Port Huron, and it is understood that boats stopped there only when signaled, or when they had passengers or freight to be delivered there; it being located in the outskirts of the city. An approach was constructed for teams and pedestrians across defendant’s premises, starting at Military street and at the northwest corner of defendant’s land, and extending a little east of south to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Cross v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cotant v. Boone Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Collins v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lemon v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dube v. Northwestern Cooperage & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Frank Anthony Scola v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank National AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Woods v. White Star LineMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API