Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McLeod v. Chase

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 17, 1928Published

1Concurrence

Within their authority, officers may enforce the law that is applicable to the facts of the case; and to act without supporting appropriate facts would be to enforce the individual will, not the law.

The writ of habeas corpus has been used in this State to release a person held under a commitment issued on a preliminary hearing before a county judge acting as a committing magistrate, where the evidence wholly failed to sustain the charge on which the commitment was made. See Exparte Brandau, 26 Fla. 142, 7 So.2d Rep. 528. See also Exparte Eagan, 18 Fla. 194; Ex parte Harfourd, 16 Fla. 283; 29…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. Ex parte KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Ex parte PrinceSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. In re RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API