Legal Opinion
Thomas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 3, 1969No. K-249PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECTOR, Judge.
On May 17, 1968, Amos Carlton Thomas, also known as A. C. Clark, was found guilty by a jury on the charge of uttering a forged instrument. Timely notice of appeal was filed by Thomas. However, the said notice was defective in that the same failed to meet the requirements of Florida Appellate Rule 3.2(c), 32 F.S.A. Accordingly, the State moved to dismiss said appeal on July 8, 1968, by reason of such defect. Perceiving that the notice of appeal did fail to meet the requirements of the cited rule as contended by the State, yet being of the view that the things and matters…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Hollingshead v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Ruben v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- French v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972