Claim of Goding v. Par Microsystems
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Cardona, P.J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 13, 2000, which ruled that claimant’s respiratory condition was not causally related to her employment and denied her claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
This appeal stems from a controverted occupational disease claim for respiratory distress allegedly arising out of claimant’s exposure to irritants in her workplace. In the course of the workers’ compensation proceedings, claimant’s treating physician testified that claimant was disabled by an occupational respiratory condition. Although he suspected…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Van Patten v. Quandt's Wholesale DistributorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ClevelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Altes v. Petrocelli Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Dongarra v. Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Hare v. Champion InternationalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Maldonado v. Exclusive Auto Body Supply Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Henderson v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009