Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Lloyd

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1965No. 3660PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

This action was brought for the custody of a four-year-old girl. The plaintiffs (now appellants) are a married couple with whom the child has resided for over three years. The defendant (now appellee) is the natural mother of the child. From the evidence the trial court found that the mother “is a fit and proper person to have custody of her minor child, and that it is in the best interests of the child that custody be awarded to her.” Appellants challenge this finding.

The established rule in this jurisdiction is that one who would withhold a child from its natural parent…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coles v. ColesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Louise Flood Bell v. Gwendolyn Hairston Leonard, Alonzo Bell and Louise Virginia Bell v. Gwendolyn Hairston LeonardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Steele v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re Petition for Adoption of J. S. R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Chase v. GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API