Legal Opinion

Howard v. The Georgia

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 10, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBeNedict, J.

This is an action to recover seaman’s wages. The defense is payment. The evidence is that the vessel was owned by a man in Matanzas named Torrontagui; that subsequent to the commencement of the action the libelant’s proctor received from one Monjo, the agent of the owner of the vessel, money to pay off the crew, and accordingly the men were paid by the proctor, and receipts for those wages taken from the men. Monjo testifies that he had no interest whatever in the vessel; that the money he gave the proctor to pay the wages was an advance made by him for account of the owner of the vessel. The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. GydaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1916
  2. The PaulineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API