Legal Opinion
Burrows v. Burrows
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of divorce, plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in awarding 70% of the majority of the marital assets to defendant. “In distributing the marital assets, the court has great flexibility and discretion to fashion an equitable award” (Lester v Lester, 237 AD2d 872, 874). Defendant’s business, which was started by defendant’s grandfather and is made up of several closely held…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Siegel v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Koczaja v. KoczajaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Povosky v. PovoskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Selinger v. SelingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Schanback v. SchanbackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elniski v. Niagara Falls Coach Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rotella v. DernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- ELNISKI, KELIANN v. NIAGARA FALLS COACH LINES, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Elniski v. Niagara Falls Coach Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- HSBC Bank v. Infinity Auto Glass Distributors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006