Legal Opinion

Finery Silk Stocking Co. v. Ætna Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

The parties to this controversy have stipulated all the material facts upon which the dispute between them has arisen. The plaintiff is a domestic corporation, having its office and place of business at 173 East Eighty-seventh street, New York city, and was and now is engaged in the manufacture of silk stockings and underwear. The defendant is a foreign corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Connecticut, duly authorized by law to carry on business in the State of New York, among other things, to conduct the business of writing and issuing…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Katherine Mazzaferro, Joanne Malec, and Ruth Glahn v. Rli Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Theatre Guild Productions, Inc. v. Insurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Smith v. BoerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  4. Chodorow v. Berkshire Mutual Fire InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API