Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1976Published

1Dissent

Herlihy, P. J. (dissenting).

There can be no doubt that the objectants established that on April 26, 1972 the decedent suffered from senile dementia and their expert gave the further opinion that he so suffered on the day he made the will as a matter of pure opinion. Of course, there was no medical evidence to the contrary because the decedent was not given a medical examination on July 17, 1972 and it was established that the impairment was permanent. The psychiatrist, however, also testified that senile people have lucid intervals; that such a person’s content of thought may improve on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of HonigmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. In re the Estate of EtollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. In re the Probate of the Proposed Paper Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of McClearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API