Legal Opinion

Toledo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 17, 1984No. 83-2019PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

452 So.2d 661 (1984)

Roberto TOLEDO, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 83-2019.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 17, 1984.

Kurt Marmar, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Randi B. Klayman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault with a firearm. He contends on appeal that the trial court erroneously precluded him from introducing evidence which, he says, would have supported his claim that he acted in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  3. Price v. Gray's Guard Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. State v. ScrogginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CataldoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Mobley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API