Sinks v. English
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Marion Probate Court. In this case English, assignee, &c. was the plaintiff below, and Sinks, administrator, &c. the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.
This is an action of covenant, on a writing obligatory, executed by the intestate, Snow. It was assigned by the payee to John West, and by the latter to English, the plaintiff. Pleas — 1st, non-assignment by the payee to John West, and 2dly, payment by the maker to the payee. Issues on both pleas to the country, and verdict and judgment in favour of the plaintiff.
By a bill of exceptions, the correctness of the opinion of the Court below, rejecting as a witness, in support of the pleas, the defendant in the action, is presented.
Perhaps no branch of the law has been more benefited, by…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fox v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Sharpe v. ThatcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1790
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grimes v. BoothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
- Jackson v. BarronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1859