Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Murphy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenblatt, J.

In her will, the testator (birth mother) bequeathed real and personal property to her adopted-out son. Because she outlived him, we must decide whether the bequests lapsed or pass to his issue under New York’s anti-lapse statute (EPTL 3-3.3).

In 1924, the testator, Mildred B. Murphy, gave birth to a son, Arthur. Arthur went to live with Jim E. and Mae Manning and was known throughout his childhood as Clair Willard Manning. The Mannings officially adopted him in 1944, when he was 19. Mildred had no other children. Clair and his birth mother reestablished their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. In re the Estate of BestNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In re the Estate of SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 2008
  2. In re CampbellNew York Surrogate's Court · 2010
  3. In re SvenningsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. In Re Estate of MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In re SvenningsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API