Legal Opinion
Isler v. Grondolsky
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 4:11-40032-GAOPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
The magistrate judge to whom this matter was referred has filed a Report and Recommendation with respect to the respondent’s motion to dismiss or alternately for summary judgment. The petitioner objects to the Report and Recommendation for three reasons.
He first contends that his security classification as a sex offender violates his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment *172because it will “affect the duration of his sentence” by decreasing the likelihood of placement in a halfway house. Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 487, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jolley v. Unknown Named Bop DirectorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Martinez v. SpauldingDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Martinez v. SpauldingDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Sevegny v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023
- Waylen Block v. Warden BowersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026